I think this also ties in with the Professor's recent post about sex positive nudism. There's a duality to the body that Americans (by and large it seems to be an American problem) haven't collectively wrapped their heads around. Are breasts sexual? Technically no, they are really the primary food source for new born mammals. Are they erogenous zones? Absolutely and probably the most significant after the actual sex organs. But since the latter is all people see and think about it creates a real impediment to their first function, both during the out in public setting and the home
top of page
bottom of page