top of page

Some Thoughts on Peace on Earth and Good Will to Men

Updated: Oct 3, 2023

Some Thoughts on Peace on Earth and Good Will to Men.






I heard the bells By Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

I heard the bells on Christmas Day

Their old, familiar carols play, and wild and sweet the words repeat of peace on earth, good-will to men!

And thought how, as the day had come, the belfries of all Christendom had rolled along the unbroken song of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Till ringing, singing on its way, the world revolved from night to day, a voice, a chime, a chant sublime of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Then from each black, accursed mouth the cannon thundered in the South, and with the sound the carols drowned of peace on earth, good-will to men!

It was as if an earthquake rent the hearth-stones of a continent, and made forlorn the households born of peace on earth, good-will to men!

And in despair I bowed my head; "There is no peace on earth," I said; "For hate is strong, and mocks the song of peace on earth, good-will to men!"

Then pealed the bells more loud and deep: "God is not dead, nor doth He sleep; the wrong shall fail, the right prevail, with peace on earth, good-will to men."


I first heard this poem as a song by Johnny Cash and the words hold their same power for me today as they have always held.


Longfellow’s son had been seriously wounded a few weeks before Christmas of 1863 and he was grieving for not just his own loss, but the travail of an entire nation as blood ran in rivers from Civil War battlefields. There is no doubt that the world seemed bleak to Longfellow at that moment. Yet, the struggle for Peace on Earth, Good Will to Men is not that of a season, or year or a decade. No, it is the struggle of mankind from the dawn of civilization.


It is so very hard for us to take the concept of global justice and peace within the perspective of the history of civilization. We are all so very myopic, preferring to enlarge our own struggles and hardships and minimize the progress that has been made by humanity.


Conventional wisdom is that things are getting worse and worse.


I will have you know that is simply not true.


The world has been progressing forward, howbeit by fits and jerks for millennia and the pace of improvement has accelerated over the past several hundred years.


Consider how there is more and more outrage over smaller and smaller affronts to human dignity. This is the 100th anniversary of WW1. From August till Christmas 1914, more people were killed in that war than all the wars across the world in the past 10 years; and, each of the next few years that war only got more bloody. Or we might consider what is being passed off as examples of virulent racism today no longer bears any resemblance to the genocide that the word racism was coined to describe. The rights of minority groups across the globe has never been higher at any time in human history. Sure we humans still struggle with harassment and even violence but what we have nearly entirely eliminated is wholesale slaughter of those considered to be outside the mainstream. What we are witnessing this year by the group ISIS is shocking to our modern minds because it is so rare; however, go back 500 years and such events were the norm not the exception.


A recent study concluded that in the last decade a lower percentage of the world’s population is actively at war than at any time in recorded history. Yes we cringe at the images from Syria & Iraq, but the very fact that we see such images is abhorrent is evidence of how far we have come as a species. In tribal societies warfare was endemic and nearly constant. Anthropologists tell us that in remote Amazonian cultures cut off from the modern world, around 25% of all males die violent deaths due to constant inter group warfare. Rape and kidnaping of women is simply the norm as one group seeks advantage over others. This pattern was true in all primitive tribal societies across the globe, despite the enduring popular fantasy that these societies were models of social cooperation.


If we look at the challenges we face today. Most stem from the simple fact that we now have over 7 billion people alive. Why do we have 7 billion people on earth, even while adult fertility rates worldwide have been falling rapidly? Because for the first time in human history most children born not only grow up to be adults, but they will live nearly twice as long as did people 300 years ago. Death by violence, disease and starvation are the exception not the rule.


When I wrote the first draft of this essay, the Newtown school shootings had been in the news recently. Certainly those killings were a tragedy for those nearby, but why was it a national tragedy? What percentage of Americans were actually impacted by the events and not by the media reports of the events? In the year after Newtown approximately 16,000 Americans were killed by drunk drivers. Far more children die by that than they do by a mentally ill person with a gun. But it does not play the same way in the media because it is not sensational.


Sensational, is code for “bad news with dead bodies” and even the most mature and serious major news outlet panders to sensationalism like Newtown on a daily basis. I guess it is part of our nature, but is it really healthy for us to focus on the worst things that happen in the entire planet each day? One of the things I am seeing more and more of, are stories of stupidity by local school teachers or administrators. Hardly a day goes by that some teacher somewhere in the nation says something stupid or hurtful and it gets national attention. Yet, how many million times a day do teachers do something kind and helpful that never gets a line of press?


Humans only have so much emotional range, and I’m quite sure the net effect of this is to deaden us to appropriate emotional responses to things that happen in our own cities or neighborhoods unless they are accompanied by graphic pictures or media hype.


On the other hand, good news goes underreported. This is not just because the media don’t think it’s interesting, it’s because good news often undermines political groups who thrive on bad news.

A little over two years ago I was doing some serious digging into the most current data on education and equality. In the process, I found some startlingly good news about which no one seems to care.


The most striking thing I found regarded the progress of African-Americans in education. Buried in a new report by the US Dept. of Education’s Center for Educational Statistics it was shown that as of 2010, 15 % of the undergraduate college students and 14% of graduate students are African-American. So what? Well elsewhere in the report it sated that 15% of the school children in the US are African-American. Thus 150 years after the ending of slavery and 50 years after the last public University in the nation was opened to all races, African-Americans are fully and equally represented in our colleges and universities. That’s HUGE!


When I posted that on my blog that week it was surely the first public release of that analysis. It should have been front page news rather than in a tiny blog. And no it was not picked up by the news media.


Similarly in studying poverty issues, I found that the reason poverty rates have remained stagnant over the past 50 years is not that the lot of the poor has not improved; but, rather the definition of poverty continues to change to encompass far more affluence now than it did a half a century ago. By design, the poverty rate remains stagnate as it represents the poorest percentage; it does not represent actual material goods. The truth is that the lifestyle of the center of the middle class in 1950 would be considered poverty by today’s standards. Thus, things are getting better for the poor, it’s just we are all told that is not true.


Overall in my lifetime, civil rights have grown by leaps and bounds, hunger and disease have been reduced radically, educational opportunity for the poorest children and those with disabilities has greatly improved, we no longer live under the pall of immanent nuclear destruction, there has been a seismic shift in concerns for the environment…..and the list goes on and on.

Even though dwelling on such truths does not benefit the media or political establishments, the truth is real just the same.


So when we consider the Holiday season this year. Do not despair. The world is not, as some would have us believe, going from bad to worse.


So, listen to those bells and rejoice that Peace on Earth is within reach if we let it.


107 views3 comments

Recent Posts

See All

3 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Ananda
Ananda
Dec 26, 2021

I agree that the modern and postmodern societies are better off than our premodern ancestors. Modern and postmodern mindsets are more focussed on the individual than the group, although group thinking is still alive and well in the woke/political correct bullying. Even though greed has been with us since the dawn of time, the impact of billionaires and multinational corporations on the environment is devastating. In South Africa Shell received permission from greedy politicians to explore the South African coast for gas with seismic blasting that will have a destructive impact on marine life. Society is fighting back and there is a conscious awareness amongst ordinary people. A new humanity is arising with this question posted by Terry Pattern in…

Like
Replying to

Thank you...I never thought of if like that

Like

sugarlessroark
sugarlessroark
Dec 26, 2021

This is a pretty sensitive bit of thinking. Most people seem to think we're going to hell in a bucket, but world literacy is growing, there's less hunger, and we have more chance of dying by our own hands than by all other violence. The 25% death-by-violence number—which I first saw in Napoleon Chignon's book about the Yanomamo, The Fierce People—reminds me of something Matt Ridley noted in The Rational Optimist. "The warfare death rate of 0.5% of the population per year that was typical of many hunter-gatherer societies would equate to two billion people dying during the twentieth century (instead of 100 million)." I think Ridley, a science writer, but also a British peer, is complacent in expecting commerce…

Like
bottom of page